Senior South Tyneside councillors granted 'dispensations' over interests
Under rules governing councillors, members must apply for ‘dispensations’ to participate and vote where they have an interest in an item - financial or non-financial - which may otherwise require them to leave the meeting or sit out of the decision-making.
After a fresh look at dispensations in place and those which might be required, South Tyneside Council’s Standards Committee was asked to discuss the matter as part of an update prompted by council officers.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAccording to a report prepared for councillors this week, dispensations aim to ensure "good governance of the authority and its decision-making."
The first application for dispensation was linked to council leader, Cllr Iain Malcolm and deputy leader Cllr Tracey Dixon and their roles within Newcastle International Airport Limited (NIAL).
This included Malcolm’s position as non-executive director of NIAL and both councillors' personal interests as director (Cllr Malcolm) and alternative director (Cllr Dixon) of Newcastle Airport’s Local Authority Holding Company Ltd.
NIAL is a public-private partnership between Durham, Gateshead, Newcastle, North Tyneside, Northumberland, Sunderland and South Tyneside councils and AMP Capital.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAlthough Cllr Malcolm and Cllr Dixon do not receive any financial awards for their roles, the dispensation would allow both to participate in and vote on matters at council and committees which relate to the operation of NIAL - excluding matters related to the payment of board members.
A report to councillors stated the council and residents could benefit both from the "expertise and perspective brought by elected member(s)" being able to take part in meetings involving the airport or its holding company.
A second dispensation application was also lodged for four councillors involved with South Tyneside Homes Ltd.
This included chair and vice chair of the board of directors, Cllr Ed Malcolm and Cllr James Sewell, who receive allowances or DPIs from the company, and board members Cllr James Foreman and Cllr Margaret Peacock who do not.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAt the meeting, which was held via videolink and broadcast on YouTube on Monday, September 14, council officers said the applications followed detailed legal discussions.
Interim head of legal services and deputy monitoring officer, John Rumney, outlined why the applications had been lodged.
“It’s fair to say that this is quite a complex area of law and in relation to this, as well as dealing with the matters arising out of Covid-19, we did take the advice of leading counsel on this in terms of how to ensure that members comply going forward as well as seeking advice about how best to discharge the monitoring officer's duties in relation to matters that have gone on in the past," he said.
“It’s not something that has arisen in the last couple of weeks, it’s something that has been worked on for a number of months.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHe added: “I can say with some confidence that it was not something that was a live issue until after Nicola [Robason] was appointed to the post of monitoring officer and until after she then took steps to make sure that she was discharging her statutory duties as a monitoring officer completely properly.”
At the meeting, Cllr Glenn Thompson raised concerns about how the public could perceive the approval of the dispensation applications, given the length of time they had not been in place.
He also noted potential legal implications and called for the applications to be postponed to allow referrals to the relevant authorities and for “due process” to take place before a decision is made.
Legal chief, Mr Rumney, said any issues around members failing to declare interests were "far from certain in these circumstances."
But he added the request for a dispensation is "entirely forward looking" and would not "affect what has gone on in the past [or] prevent concerns being raised about previous conduct."
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHe went on to say: "The granting of a dispensation in the future would not prevent any matters that have taken place in the past being addressed and raised.
"And for that reason, there is no compelling need for matters in the future to be put on hold whilst matters in the past are dealt with.”
The meeting heard an email had been sent to all councillors asking them to "think carefully about what other roles they have" in relation to external bodies, and if councillors think their role(s) would need a dispensation they should contact legal chiefs.
While dispensations may not be necessary, Mr Rumney added, "it was something that members in the past had not been asked to look at in any detail and clearly (is) something members need to satisfy themselves about going forward."
Independent chair of the Standards Committee, Professor Grahame Wright, added that any code of conduct complaints would be dealt with by the panel in future.
He told the meeting: “It’s not a matter that we’re ignoring the past from the point of view of condoning it.
“We’re ignoring it because the decision we’re being asked to make is from today.”
The dispensation applications referenced above were approved by a majority vote, with Cllr Glenn Thompson voting against.
The Standards Committee agreed:
Cllr Iain Malcolm and Cllr Tracey DIxon will be allowed to participate, or participate further, in any discussion of any matter concerning NIAL and the airport's holding company at council meetings and/or take part in voting, for a period of two years.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThey would still be excluded from any discussion or vote regarding the potential remuneration of board members of NIAL and/or the holding company.
Councillors involved in South Tyneside Homes will be allowed to participate, or participate further, in the discussion of any matter concerning the company at all council meetings and committees and/or take part in any vote, or further vote, linked to the company.
This dispensation will run up until the annual meeting of the borough council in May 2021 and the four named councillors can't take part in discussions or votes where changes to the payment of directors of the company are discussed.
Cllr Anne Walsh was also granted a dispensation to participate and vote at the council's Pensions Committee following her appointment as a non-executive director of Border to Coast Pensions Partnership Ltd.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdShe would not be allowed to take part in any discussion or vote linked to changes to the payment of company directors.