Shock as majority of South Tyneside tanning shop sunbeds fail Trading Standards safety tests

Watch more of our videos on ShotsTV.com 
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Visit Shots! now
More than half of sunbed salons in South Tyneside have failed a Trading Standards equipment test, following a council probe into the “safety of sunbeds”.

Between July, 2024, and September, 2024, the council’s Trading Standards service carried out a series of tests on “all sunbed shops and tanning salons in South Tyneside” in a bid to “reduce potential dangers”.

According to a council report titled “safety of sunbeds”, the visits aimed to “establish how much ultraviolet radiation (UVR) the sunbeds produce, which can increase the risk of developing skin cancer”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad
More than half of sunbed salons in South Tyneside failed a Trading Standards equipment testMore than half of sunbed salons in South Tyneside failed a Trading Standards equipment test
More than half of sunbed salons in South Tyneside failed a Trading Standards equipment test | pixel2008/Flickr

The probe included a “programme of spot checks and unannounced visits” to tanning salons, beauty parlours and “other outlets offering sunbed treatments”.

Council officers wore personal protective equipment (PPE) and used a hand-held solar meter to measure the “irradiance levels from the tubes” at three places on each sunbed, namely the head, torso and feet.

Over the period between July and September, 2024, a total of 17 sunbed salons were visited across South Tyneside and results indicated that nine sunbeds (53 per cent) failed tests because “the irradiance levels exceeded the specified limit”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Although sunbed salons failing the test did so by a small margin, premises were “advised to have their equipment checked and brought into compliance” and were said to be left shocked by the news.

The data was revealed at the most recent meeting of South Tyneside Council’s Licensing and Regulatory Committee on December 6, 2024, at South Shields Town Hall.

Trading Standards officer, Simon Preston, praised the “attitude” and reaction of businesses that failed the safety tests, and reassured councillors that action had been taken.

He added that there was no indication that anybody was “deliberately” using “non-compliant” equipment but that it was clear that premises needed to “exercise more control”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“In their defence, it was generally not by a huge amount that they were exceeding the limits,” council officer Mr Preston said.

“They seemed quite shocked really, they rely on their suppliers and I suppose you have to remember that [the sunbed] is supplied and then has so many hours of use and then it has to be replaced.

“Throughout the entirety of its operating life, is it going to be at that level?

“It’s not a loss of comfort if you’re talking about public safety and believe me we take public safety very very seriously, but they did seem to pass the attitude test.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“They were shocked by it and were taking beds straight out of commission.”

According to a report presented to councillors, tanning salons are required to provide safe sunbed equipment for use by consumers and tubes used in sunbeds should comply with a set standard.

This specifies an “irradiance level of no more than 0.3 W/m2 (watts per square metre)”.

No individual sunbed shops or tanning salons were named in the council report, and it is unclear which premises passed or failed the Trading Standards tests.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In each sunbed test however, it was confirmed that the “full array” was tested as it would have been used by the customer.

Councillor Michael Clare said the failure rate for the Trading Standards probe was “quite high” and asked whether new tanning salons could be checked and whether there was a way retailers could check their own equipment.

Council officers, responding, said that shops could purchase solar meters to check their compliance and that installers should be using solar meters and should be aware of the testing that’s in the British standard.

While it was noted that Trading Standards does not normally get called in for new shop applications, council officers said this issue could be looked at in future.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It was also noted that there was an intention to re-test existing sunbed shops across South Tyneside in future.

During discussion of the report, councillors raised questions about the wider regulation of the sunbed industry, the equipment used and the amount of time people spend using sunbeds.

Councillors were told that there were health and training policies in place at sunbed shops generally and that some sites visited last year had “vigorous procedures” in place.

It was noted that the council had powers to seize equipment in certain cases and to prosecute “providers of unsafe products” but that the council’s enforcement policy followed a “stepped approach”, with “warnings given in the first instance”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Trading Standards officer Simon Preston added: “Overall, this has been a good project to try and protect the public from a potentially dangerous consumer product.

“Sunbeds do have their place of course, I know that people use them for certain skin conditions, but it’s important to make sure that they’re not causing public health concerns.”

The report to the Licensing and Regulatory Committee said the “maximum irradiance limit for UV tanning equipment is based on the opinion of the EU’s Scientific Committee on Consumer Products and as a comparison it represents the intensity of the midday sun in the summer in the Mediterranean”.

The report added the limit is “intended to match sunbed output to the maximum that human Caucasians have biologically evolved to tolerate.”

The Licensing and Regulatory Committee report can be found on South Tyneside Council’s website.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.

News you can trust since 1849
Follow us
©National World Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice